Azie Dungey\u2019s webseries Ask a Slave<\/em> exemplifies the power of satire in addressing reprehensible history. She even incorporates critical voices\u2014in the second episode of the second season\u2014that tell her she cannot joke about something as immoral as slavery. This inclusion of criticism, and the series as a whole, reminds me of two Quentin Tarantino movies: Inglourious Basterds<\/em> and Django Unchained<\/em>. In the former, Tarantino examines a special American force that fights Nazi forces in France; in the latter, he displays the vengeful rampage of a former slave. Both movies, respectively, confront perhaps the two greatest travesties in recent history: the holocaust and slavery. However, Tarantino approaches these events from the perspective of satire. In Inglourious Basterds<\/em>, he shows that the Americans successfully kill Hitler in a movie theater; in Django Unchained<\/em>, he incorporates several items that would not have been invented for decades. Tarantino intentionally makes his movies partially false and absurd because it allows the audience to digest a very flawed and equally absurd history. Indeed, it may be the only way to discuss these issues without losing the audience.<\/p>\n Likewise, Dungey bases her show on a preposterous notion\u2014a slave of George Washington who can talk with modern Americans. She furthers the absurdity with her introductory banjo music and animation, which is complete with a wink from her smiling face. Dungey incorporates these aspects into her show because it is easier to reach her audience through this medium. She then proceeds to discuss several deplorable aspects of slavery, but presents them in a humorous manner. A guest jokes that Jefferson\u2019s slaves are treated well because he has sex with them; Lizzie Mae spits out an (admittedly funny) flurry of expletives in response to the notion that \u201cslavery isn\u2019t that bad\u201d after all; and she even flips a guest off. The character of Lizzie Mae confronts ridiculous assumptions of slavery with clever, humorous retorts that never fail to make me laugh. While these represent but a few of her jokes, they collectively indicate the severity and sensitivity of the subject matter at hand. Moreover, she addresses the treatment of Indians when her guest \u201cRed Jacket\u201d visits the show. He discloses that he enjoys burnt corn soup because it commemorates the burning of Indian people and cornfields. He furthers that he got an enormous medal in exchange for his people\u2019s land. Dungey\u2019s decision to address Indian suffrage furthers the idea that she is indeed trying to educate people, but in a different way than a documentary or textbook would.<\/p>\n By discussing these issues in a satirical manner, Dungey effectively reaches her audience. Instead of portraying the serious and very real travesties that slaves endured, she jokes about them in a talk-show forum. As \u201cAsk A Slave\u2019s Critique of the American Education System\u201d pointed out, we lack accurate understandings of slavery because of our decision to not educate all children about the dark side of our history. Dungey very much recognizes this problem. In one episode, she talks to children and even changes her introductory text from \u201cprotect the guilty\u201d to \u201cprotect the innocent.\u201d In this way, she acknowledges that these kids are victims of the system, and that the only way to reform education might be through the power of satire. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Azie Dungey\u2019s webseries Ask a Slave exemplifies the power of satire in addressing reprehensible history. She even incorporates critical voices\u2014in the second episode of the second season\u2014that tell her she cannot joke about something as immoral as slavery. This inclusion of criticism, and the series as a whole, reminds me of two Quentin Tarantino movies: … <\/p>\n