Although many secessionist leaders denied it in the decades after the American Civil War, the institution of slavery was undoubtedly the cause of the conflict that left the United States divided in the 1860s. Identifying these self-justifying denials as the reason for one of the greatest falsifications in American history, Sean Wilentz attempts to set the record straight, claiming that Southern secession was directly related to slavery. By referencing the state secession conventions of 1860 and 1861, he justifies his assertion. According to Wilentz, the conventions clearly identified the attacks on slavery by the northern democracy as the fundamental issue of their secession; he mentions that even cooperationists agreed with this, quoting a moderate Alabama delegate who recognized the fight to extend slavery as \u201cthe Iliad of all our woes.\u201d Wilentz continues, contending that \u201cnothing could disguise the Confederacy\u2019s overriding purpose, dear to Rhettist aristocrats and southern Master Race democrats alike: to create a republican government formally based on racial slavery.\u201d<\/p>\n
In addition to targeting slavery as the main cause of Southern secession, Wilentz maintains that slavery also served as \u201cthe highest good that united the secessionist cause.\u201d\u00a0He notes how \u201c the secessionists propagandized the interests of both slaveholders and nonslaveholders as\u2026 identical\u201d in order to strengthen the secessionist movement and cites prominent editor James De Bow who acknowledged that although there were a great number of nonslaveholders, they directly benefitted from the institution of slavery. In addition to benefitting them economically, slavery also had the potential to benefit them socially as purchasing slaves signified upward mobility in the South. Therefore, it made sense for nonslaveholders to support the secessionists in order to protect their own interests. As the author of \u201cThe South Gaining Support\u201d mentions, the secessionists also attempted to unify their cause by appealing to the nonslaveholders\u2019 \u201cwhite supremacist pride and fears.\u201d Immediate emancipation would mean a shameful submission by slaveholders and nonslaveholders alike. The ultimate result was a strong sense of nationalism in the South. As Wilentz notes, \u201cthroughout the lower South, men dressed in uniforms and waving flags of various designs volunteered to fight for a nation that did not yet exist.\u201d<\/p>\n
Overall, Wilentz does a great job at uncovering the true cause of the American Civil War and justifying his assertion. He combats the denials of secessionist leaders by turning to the declarations of the secession conventions. Furthermore, Wilentz makes a strong argument as to how the South became so unified. Slavery was clearly the Iliad of Southerners\u2019 Woes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Although many secessionist leaders denied it in the decades after the American Civil War, the institution of slavery was undoubtedly the cause of the conflict that left the United States divided in the 1860s. Identifying these self-justifying denials as the reason for one of the greatest falsifications in American history, Sean Wilentz attempts to set … <\/p>\n