The Fatal Environment<\/i> by Richard Slotkin takes an unconventional approach to analyzing environmental history, using the lens of 19th<\/sup> century myths in literal works and newspapers to hone in on what the frontier truly was. Through his analysis, Slotkin references the debate that we are continually having in class, what is nature and the sub questions that have come with this ongoing debate? Using the Western Frontier as his study of nature, he says \u201cit is divided between two realms: the \u201cMetropolis,\u201d the civilizational center; and the \u201cWilderness,\u201d into which the heroic energies of the Metropolis are projected (41). In breaking down Slotkin\u2019s definition, we can see his position in that humanity does in fact exist in nature, as human heroics are allowed to tread there. But, he also seems to clearly state that the more sophisticated and advanced members of society leaving the more \u201cprimitive\u201d to extend their travels into the unknown and resource filled wilderness, which for him is somewhat synonymous with nature.<\/p>\n Slotkin\u2019s ideas on the west, and thereby nature, being more primitive are further represented in his piece when referencing the classic captivity and hunter narrative that are so prevalent in many 19th<\/sup> century literary works. In describing this narrative, Slotkin indicates that the frontier was one of \u201cregression\u201d civilized men and women leave contemporary society, and enter- willingly or as captive- a primitive, primal world (63). Though nature under Slotkin\u2019s school of thought does contain a human hand, it also represents a digression from the promise of industrialization in the cities into the dangerous and often Native American inhabited frontier.<\/p>\n For some though, this journey into the frontier and away from the \u201ccivilized\u201d society of the city was not a bad thing, but something of a rebirth. Slotkin indicates through the narrative of Sam Houston that the frontier often offered a renewal to men who had suffered \u201cmoral or material ruin\u201d in the struggles of the metropolis (163). For Houston, this is exactly what happened, and after living with the Cherokee Indians and learned \u201cNature\u2019s truths\u201d he emerged from his journey to embark upon his most memorable feats in the war for Texas\u2019s Independence from Mexico. Though he may have entered the \u201cprimitive land\u201d to live with Native Americans, Houston never lost his more sophisticated teachings, continuing to read literary works, thereby displaying his status what Slotkin coins as a \u201cnatural aristocrat\u201d (163).<\/p>\n As this is the first post for this week, I thought it would be a good idea to connect Slotkin\u2019s work to one of the overarching questions of our class, that being about nature as an \u201cactor.\u201d Through Slotkin\u2019s usage of literature as a lens to analyze environmental history, I believe he does a great job of framing nature as an actor in the cultural development of the United States, specifically as the antagonist of the story. Throughout the piece, Slotkin identifies the frontier, thereby the most \u201cnatural\u201d part of the United States as an uncivilized and primitive environment. Under this understanding, the natural landscape of the United States becomes not only the antagonist of the story, but something that must be overcome and conquered in order for society to blossom. Through his descriptions of nature being an entity that must overcome and conquered, Slotkin casts the natural environment of the West (the frontier) as somewhat of an organic creature, one that actively fights against the progressions of American culture.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Fatal Environment by Richard Slotkin takes an unconventional approach to analyzing environmental history, using the lens of 19th century myths in literal works and newspapers to hone in on what the frontier truly was. Through his analysis, Slotkin references the debate that we are continually having in class, what is nature and the sub … <\/p>\n