Warning: Undefined variable $num in /home/shroutdo/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/single-categories/single_categories.php on line 126
Warning: Undefined variable $posts_num in /home/shroutdo/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/single-categories/single_categories.php on line 127
The author’s thesis expresses how the small section of borderland between Arizona and Mexico reflects the world as a whole, in that it can be viewed as constantly in a transitional state of flux despite the constraints placed on it at various times in history by governments. It is his contention that settlers throughout the history of the world are never completely controlled, despite political, economic and even good intentions as motivation. People will do what they want to do regardless of borders, or as he expresses it, NAFTA and 9/11 represent greater forces at work than our borders (p.184). This theme can be seen in Sim’s book, A Union Forever, with the British trying to impose rule over the Irish, and Americans aiding the Irish despite The Neutrality Act of 1794 in the U.S. that prohibited them from doing this. More recently, we see this in the dissolving of the borders of Yugoslavia through war due to religious and cultural differences, and more in the more amicable dissolution of Czechoslovakia.
While I agree with Morgan’s assessment of Truett’s overall view of the borderlands, that corporations and politics played a huge role in both the lax, at times, and contested at other times, border, it should be added, that it was the investment in innovation that was the source of the push for fixed borders so that the natural resources that fed the corporations and the governments would flow without contention or war between the U.S. and Mexico. The Apaches, who were neither part of the corporate enterprises, nor part of the European settlers’ cultures, were militarily decimated by the U.S. and Mexican governments, while the settlers and enterprises that benefited the U.S. and its push for electricification through the copper from the Phelps Dodge mines (68-9) were supported. Both U.S. and Mexican governments gave away huge tracts of the Apache’s land on their borders, ignoring treaties made with the Apaches (p.40). Mining for copper and raising cattle were tremendous resources for entrepreneurs and the governments on both sides of the border. While the state of flux at the border, and broken promises to the Apaches led to bloodshed for the settlers, the defined borders led to the virtual annihilation of the Apache people. Enterprise, innovation, and economics, therefore, can be seen as the primary elements that shattered all other motivations including moral codes.
Samuel Truett’s, Fugitive Landscape, is an historiographic contribution to the field of the transitional history of the south-western border of the U.S and Mexico. Using archived material from the U.S. and Mexico’s Arizona-Sonoran borderlands from late 18-19th centuries, accounts for the book’s in-depth and detailed humanitarian look at the complex connections, events and actors concerned. This multiethnic, transnational history reveals the fugitive landscape of these borderlands. The history of these borderlands was originally conceived by Truett for his PhD dissertation at Yale. He was convinced to expand on his dissertation by William Cronon, a colleague, who “open[ed his] eyes to humanists’ potential of environmental history” (ix).
Truett’s narrative style and use of connotative language to portray events and settings tends to romanticize his vision of the west, setting a mood not typically found in formal historiographic writing. The writing is descriptive and passionate, involving readers in the energy and mood, (as Truett perceived it), of the time. Truett successfully engages the reader in the historical events of the past, and then incorporates his research to connect the past and the present, making the book an excellent historical work as well as an enjoyable one. He describes the actors at a dinner at the Democrat Club in New York, for instance, as “duck[ing] out of the cold” and “stripping off their coats and scarves…to dream of distant sun-baked lands blessed by nature” (p.1). It is possible that such sentiments were expressed by the actors involved, but as Truett directly quotes a toast made by a member at the dinner. Adding the romanticized language, rather than relying on the words of those present, seems to express less a desire to produce a strictly accurate and formal historiographic work, and more a choice to produce an in-depth book designed to inspire interest in the subject of these borderlands and their history among a wider population.